Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brode

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1921No. L. A. No. 5754PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

From a judgment against her in an action to quiet title to an undivided one-half interest in certain real property, the plaintiff appeals.

The defendant is the surviving husband of one Eva Erode, deceased, and the plaintiff is E'va Erode’s daughter by- a former marriage. Eva Erode died intestate, leaving as her heirs only the plaintiff and the defendant. Her estate apparently was not administered upon. At the time of her death the record title to the property, which is the subject of the action, stood in the name of herself and her husband as tenants in common, having been conveyed by deed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Shaw v. BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Pabst v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McComb v. SpanglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gapsch v. GapschIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API