Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Owen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1990No. 8926SC1072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s findings of fact that there existed no genuine issues of material facts and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law and the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of defendants dismissing plaintiff’s action with prejudice. Plaintiff contends that several genuine issues of material fact are established in the record. First, plaintiff contends that an issue of fact exists concerning whether defendants rendered sufficient post-surgical follow-up care. We disagree and affirm.

Initially we note that

[i]n a medical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Starnes v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. White v. HunsingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Dickens v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Parks v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Tice v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Bowlin v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Diehl v. KofferCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Brooks v. HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Elliott v. OwenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API