Bowlin v. Duke University
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We note initially that the summary judgment below did not resolve all claims between all parties. Partial summary judgment is interlocutory and subject to dismissal. However, following our Supreme Court’s reasoning and holding in Oestreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118, 225 S.E.2d 797 (1976) and its progeny, we conclude that plaintiff had a substantial right to have all her claims tried at the same time before the same judge and jury. We therefore will determine plaintiff’s appeal on its merits.
Plaintiff sets forth four assignments of error for our review. First, plaintiff argues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Foard v. JarmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Diehl v. KofferCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Robinson v. Duke University Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Howie v. WalshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.