Legal Opinion

Tice v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 410A83PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The determinative issue on this appeal is whether Josie Phillips Tice is entitled to rely upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to take her case to the jury on the question of the negligence of defendant Hall. We hold that the plaintiff is so entitled. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was erroneously granted.

“Uniformly, in this and other courts, res ipsa loquitur has been applied to instances where foreign bodies, such as sponges, towels, needles, glass, etc., are introduced into the patient’s body during surgical operations and left there.” Mitchell v. Saunders,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Mitchell v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. GILMORE MEM. HOSP.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Coleman v. RiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Edwards v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Schaffner v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Clark v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API