Hyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. Gunderson
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCHRODER.
While we find it was error in the trial of this products liability/medical malpractice case to allow evidence of the cross-claim to be admitted, we adjudge it to be harmless error. We find no in the Appellant’s other allegations. Hence, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
FACTS
On September 28, 1993, Mary Gunder-son, age thirty-two, gave birth by cesarean section to her second child, Wesley Gun-derson. Because Mary did not want to breastfeed, Mary’s obstetrician, Dr. Lyman Armstrong, prescribed the drug Par-lodel (bromocriptine mesylate) to…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- MV Transportation, Inc. v. AllgeierKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Prather v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Luna v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Boland-Maloney Lumber Co. v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.