Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. Benner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1918No. 9165PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Dorsey Benner against the Oklahoma Automobile Company, a corporation. ' Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings, error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

In the petition filed in this case, it is alleged: That the Oklahoma Automobile Company is a corporation formed for the purpose of buying and selling automobiles, running and operating a taxicab and transfer line out and in'the city of Enid, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was so engaged in said city of Enid; and that the defendant the Oklahoma Auto & Bus Company is likewise a corporation formed for the purpose of buying and selling automobiles and running and operating a bus, taxicab and transfer line in the city of Enid, but that, wliile by its charter it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. R. P. Smith Sons & Co. v. Raines Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Sloan v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Pierce Oil Corporation v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API