Legal Opinion
Schaff v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 27, 1925No. 15514PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON. J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Pontotoc county, Okla., by the defendants in error, as plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant. to recovejr damages occasioned by the destruction of .the compress of the Interstate Compress Company, at Oklahoma City, by fire, on March 29, 1921, at which time the plaintiff, Ed J. Coyle-, had stored therein 243 bales of cotton, which was also destroyed. The plaintiff alleges that the fire v,as set by a locomotive engine operated by the defendant on the tracks of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway, south of said…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc. v. KavorkianAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Thomas W. Howell and Dorothy Howell, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Booth Tank Co. v. SymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.