Legal Opinion
Pierce Oil Corporation v. Myers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 9, 1926No. 15871PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEY, C.
Oral G. Myers instituted this suit in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., to recover damages for injuries to his person and to his Ford car, as a result of a collision between his car and an automobile driven by Ernest Slater on the highway between Tulsa and Sand Springs in Tulsa county, Okla. Slater was not made a party to the suit. The liability of the Pierce Oil Corporation is predicated on the allegations that at the time of the collision, the company had in its employment, as superintendent of its refinery, one Ernest Slater, and that said Slater was in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. BennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- R. P. Smith Sons & Co. v. Raines Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Independent Eastern Torpedo Co. v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Independent Torpedo Co. v. CarderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Eureka Tool Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Holland v. PERRAULT BROTHERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.