Legal Opinion
Brewer v. Indymac Bank
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 16, 2009No. 2:08-cv-01211PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.
On August 29, 2008, plaintiffs Brian K. Brewer and Suzanne L. Brewer (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed their first amended complaint (“FAC”) for damages and injunctive relief against defendants Indymac Bank (“Indymac”), Residential Mortgage Capital (“RMC”), and James Chapman (“Chapman”). This matter is before the court on defendants RMC and Chapman’s (collectively “defendants”) motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ FAC for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 1 and for failure to join a necessary party…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. HilleryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Rosal v. First Federal Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Ader v. Simonmed Imaging Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Ramos v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Susilo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.