Legal Opinion
Rosal v. First Federal Bank of California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 15, 2009No. C 09-1276 PJHPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendants First Federal Bank of California (“FFB”), Seaside Financial Corporation (“Seaside”), T.D. Service Company (“T.D.”) and All Phase Brokers (“All Phase”). Also before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant ServiceLink. Plaintiff Jeffery Rosal (“plaintiff’) opposes the motions. The court finds these matters suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and considered the…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Davidson v. Seterus, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. KmiecikAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Castaneda v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Mehta v. Wells Fargo Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- In Re Apple & AT & T Ipad Unlimited Data Plan LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.