Legal Opinion
Tand v. SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF NASSAU CTY.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 14, 2004No. 03-CV-5822(ADS)(JO)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This action arises out of claims by Loree Tand (“Tand” or the “plaintiff’) that her former employer Solomon Schechter Day School of Nassau County (“Solomon Schechter” or the “defendant”) terminated her employment in violation of the collective bargaining agreement that governed Tand’s employment (the “CBA” or the “Agreement”). Presently before the Court is a motion by Solomon Schechter to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. State University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Peacock v. Suffolk Bus Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Ramirez v. Riverbay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Kaye v. Orange Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Hoops v. KEYSPAN ENERGYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.