Legal Opinion
Peacock v. Suffolk Bus Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 23, 2015No. CV 14-4479PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge:
Before the Court are motions to dismiss the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by all of the Defendants named herein, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff opposes the motions. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motions are granted and this action is dismissed in its entirety.
FACTS
Beginning in December 2006, Plaintiff, Michael Peacock (“Plaintiff’), was employed as a bus driver by Defendant Suffolk Bus Corporation (“SBC”). (Compl. ¶ 16.) During the course of his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Udechukwu v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- 30 Thompson AW Holdings, LLC v. KovacsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- A. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- A.P. v. DannhauserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Alameda v. Association of Social Work BoardsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.