Legal Opinion
Hoops v. KEYSPAN ENERGY
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 1, 2011No. 10-CV-2777 (ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff Carl Hoops (“the Plaintiff’ or “Hoops”) commenced this action against his employers Keyspan Corporation and National Grid USA (the “Defendants” or “the Company”) seeking unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207. Presently before the Court is the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the ground that the overtime claim is preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185 et seq. For the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. D.M. Rothman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Kaye v. Orange Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Austin Bascom, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated v. Kennecott Utah Copper LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Austin Bascom, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated v. Kennecott Utah Copper LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Austin Bascom, Individually and for Others Similarly Situated v. Kennecott Utah Copper LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.