Legal Opinion
Martin v. State University of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2010No. CV 06-2049(WDW)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WALL, United States Magistrate Judge:
Before this court, on consent of the parties, is a motion for summary judgment by defendants State University of New York (“SUNY”), State University of New York College at Farmingdale (“SUNY Farming-dale”) 1 , Long Island Educational Opportu nity Center (“LIEOC”), Veronica Henry, Jonathan Gibralter, and Robert Reganse. Plaintiffs Rita Hegde and Diane Martin have opposed the motion. 2 For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied as to Martin’s Title VII retaliation claims pertaining to her non-renewal…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Bowen-Hooks v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Emmons v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Cowan v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Kassel v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.