Legal Opinion

Bonito v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. AC 20930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The plaintiff, Carissa Bonito, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion for a *488declaratory judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment concerning the interpretation of an insurance policy that she purchased from the defendant, Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly ignored the plain language of the policy and an endorsement to the policy. She also claims, in the alternative, that “at the very minimum the parties have set forth alternative plausible interpretations of the same policy language” and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Flint v. Universal Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ceballo v. Citizens Property Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Gager v. Gager & Peterson, LLPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Minich v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Mallozzi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. McAuley v. Southington Savings BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API