Legal Opinion

Mallozzi v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 1, 2002No. AC 21717PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The plaintiff, Mario Mallozzi, Jr., appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. The court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment after finding that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the automobile insurance policy at issue clearly and unambiguously did not provide the plaintiff coverage under the circumstances. On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the insurance contract at issue is ambiguous,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Peerless Insurance v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Salem Subway RestaurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. ARB Construction, LLC v. Pinney Construction Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Christian v. Harleysville Worcester InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API