Legal Opinion
McAuley v. Southington Savings Bank
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 2002No. AC 21461PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Barbara McAuley, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant Southington Savings Bank (bank).1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion for summary judgment on the basis of its incorrect conclusions that (1) the bank owed no duty of care to the plaintiff, who was the named beneficiary on a certificate of deposit from which funds were wrongfully withdrawn pursuant to a forged withdrawal slip, (2) there was no genuine issue of material…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gomes v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Salvio v. SalvioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coley v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Mcauley v. Southington Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002