Legal Opinion

Lakewood Associates v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 2, 1999No. 97-303LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the defendant’s motion for dismissal, or, in the alternative, cross motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Lakewood Associates, has filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that its failure to receive an appealable final decision on its wetlands development permit application is not a bar to judicial review because continuing the permitting process would have been futile. Plaintiff argues that compliance with the Corps’ requests would have been burdensome and without…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API