Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. Jarvis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1874PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChristiancy, J.

Jarvis, who was tenant for years of a farm in Kent county, bounded for over a half mile by Grand River, some distance above Grand Rapids, brought his action of trespass on the case in the Kent circuit against the booming company, for damages for flowing back the water of the river upon the lands by means of their booms and their appurtenances, erected and maintained in, along and across the river below these lands, and jams of logs and timber, received, kept and assorted in, and in connection with their booms, as used and operated by the company.

The declaration need not be further noticed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Pettigrew v. Village of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hooker v. New-Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
  4. Atlas Mining Co. v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. G., C. & Santa Fe R. R. Co. v. EddinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API