Rudolph v. Guy
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment awarding damages for breach of contract. Cross-complainant Guy and cross-defendant Mc-Callister only are involved.
Initially, plaintiff Rudolph filed suit against both Guy and McCallister on an account. McCallister joined issue; Guy, after making certain admissions, cross-claimed against McCallister, in which he alleges that McCallister agreed to sell him three trucks for a consideration of $26,250 on time and to finance him in the performance of a certain contract with the Atomic Energy Commission at Los Alamos, New Mexico. The trial court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nichols v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Rasmussen v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Rogers v. Cato Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Jackson v. GoadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Dinkle v. DentonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.