Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Guy

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1956No. 6070PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment awarding damages for breach of contract. Cross-complainant Guy and cross-defendant Mc-Callister only are involved.

Initially, plaintiff Rudolph filed suit against both Guy and McCallister on an account. McCallister joined issue; Guy, after making certain admissions, cross-claimed against McCallister, in which he alleges that McCallister agreed to sell him three trucks for a consideration of $26,250 on time and to finance him in the performance of a certain contract with the Atomic Energy Commission at Los Alamos, New Mexico. The trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Rasmussen v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rogers v. Cato Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Jackson v. GoadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dinkle v. DentonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API