Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Cato Oil & Grease Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 1964No. 40254PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
This action was brought by L. W. Rogers, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Cato Oil & Grease Company, herein called defendant, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries. The various acts of negligence and the injuries allegedly received as the result thereof occurred while plaintiff was acting in line of duty as a fireman assisting in extinguishing a fire upon defendant’s premises.
The cause was tried upon plaintiff’s fourth amended petition which, among nine allegations of negligence, charged defendant with negligence in violation of specified fire ordinances…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Anderson v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Sutherland v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Grable v. VarelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Gillham Ex Rel. Gillham v. Lake Country RacewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Spencer v. BP John Furniture CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.