Legal Opinion

Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1959No. 6452PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is a case involving a question of damages by the wrongful removal of water from a stock tank, the plaintiff-appellee seeking damages for the value of the water taken and damages to their stock-raising activities in the sum of $6,940 and punitive damages in the sum of $2,000. The case was tried before a jury in Sandoval County and the jury awarded a verdict of $4,900 actual damages and $1,000 punitive damages. Appellant moved to set aside the verdict and alternatively for a new trial. A judgment based upon the verdict was entered, followed shortly thereafter by an order…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Pendergrass v. LovelaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hagerman Irrigation Co. v. McMurryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bader v. CerriNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fredenburgh v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Montoya v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Broadcort Capital Corp. v. Summa Medical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Albert A. Devries, and A. Devries and Sons, Incorporated, a Corporation v. E. H. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API