Legal Opinion

Colonial Mutual Compensation Insurance v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1934No. Civ. No. 9889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

Petitioner duly organized under the Workmen’s Compensation Insurance Act as a limited mutual company. It applied to the respondent for a certificate of authority tendering for approval securities and cash in an amount of $25,000. May 22, 1934, respondent submitted the application to the attorney-general and thereafter the last-named official advised the insurance commissioner that a company commencing business must deposit a minimum of cash or securities in the amount of $100,000. Whereupon respondent refused petitioner the certificate of authority *653upon, the sole ground that, as directed hy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Mayes v. Paul Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  3. Godward v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Comstock v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People ex rel. Labachotte v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API