Legal Opinion

Katemis v. Westerlind

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1956No. Civ. 21465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Appeal by defendant from an adverse judgment in a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of realty and damages. On a prior trial a judgment of nonsuit was rendered. On appeal that judgment was reversed. (Katemis v. Westerlind, 120 Cal.App.2d 537 [261 P.2d 553].)

Defendant was the owner of a parcel of realty in Los Angeles improved with a furnished apartment house. On February 23, 1952 plaintiff George Katemis and defendant signed the instrument, pertinent provisions of which are copied in the margin, 1 by which Katemis agreed to buy and defendant agreed to sell the property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Miller v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Lopez v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API