Legal Opinion
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 2012No. C067164PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1487Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning, Rosemary Atkinson, Paul Diaz, and Susan Rutherford Rich petitioned for writ of mandate to direct defendants City of Stockton (City) and Stockton City Council to vacate its approval of a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the A.G. Spanos Business Park Development in Stockton. After our Supreme Court issued its decision in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481, 489 [106 Cal.Rptr.3d 858, 227 P.3d 416] (Stockton Citizens), holding that plaintiffs’ California Environmental Quality Act…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Verizon California Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- 1305 Ingraham, LLC v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.