Hoots v. Beeson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
There was ample evidence to warrant submission of the negligence and contributory negligence issues and to support the jury’s findings thereon. The jury answered the negligence issue, “Yes.” The question for decision is whether there was error in the portion of the court’s charge relating to the contributory negligence issue.
Plaintiff excepts, inter alia, to the following portions of the court’s instructions to the jury: (1) “It being the law, members of the jury, that where both parties to an action like this are negligent, that neither can recover, that the negligence of one offsets the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pino Ex Rel. Pino v. SzuchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- In re T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. St. Stephen's Episcopal ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- MAYNARD BY MAYNARD v. Indiana Harbor Belt R. Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. K. W. D. S., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.