Legal Opinion

Cozart v. Chapin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1979No. 7810SC109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence on the grounds: (1) that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish actionable negligence by defendant and (2) that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant’s failure to orient the x-ray with plaintiff’s mouth was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury.

Our Supreme Court held in Hunt v. Bradshaw, 242 N.C. 517, 521-22, 88 S.E. 2d 762, 765 (1955):

“A physician or surgeon who undertakes to render professional services must…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wentz v. Unifi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Hart v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API