Cozart v. Chapin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence on the grounds: (1) that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish actionable negligence by defendant and (2) that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish that defendant’s failure to orient the x-ray with plaintiff’s mouth was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury.
Our Supreme Court held in Hunt v. Bradshaw, 242 N.C. 517, 521-22, 88 S.E. 2d 762, 765 (1955):
“A physician or surgeon who undertakes to render professional services must…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wentz v. Unifi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Hart v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017