Hasso v. Hasso
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, classification of money flowing into a trust, particularly in seven- or eight-figure amounts, can become a focus of controversy that drives a stake into the heart of a family. Such is the case here, where a widow is the sole income beneficiary of a marital trust established by her deceased husband, and their grown son and daughter are remainder beneficiaries whose pecuniary interests are at odds with the mother’s: Mother benefits from money allocated as income to the trust because it all goes to her; son and daughter are better served when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ace American Insurance v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Anthony EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manson v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Guliex v. PennyMac Holdings CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013