Legal Opinion

Hasso v. Hasso

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 2007No. G036369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, classification of money flowing into a trust, particularly in seven- or eight-figure amounts, can become a focus of controversy that drives a stake into the heart of a family. Such is the case here, where a widow is the sole income beneficiary of a marital trust established by her deceased husband, and their grown son and daughter are remainder beneficiaries whose pecuniary interests are at odds with the mother’s: Mother benefits from money allocated as income to the trust because it all goes to her; son and daughter are better served when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Ace American Insurance v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Anthony EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manson v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Guliex v. PennyMac Holdings CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API