Legal Opinion
Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1994No. B069394PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Harnethia Mansell (Mansell), in propria persona, appeals a judgment denying her petition for writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) against defendant and respondent Board of Administration of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) (hereafter referred to as the Board).
The issue is not Mansell’s basic entitlement to retirement benefits but only whether she is eligible for enhanced benefits. We address whether Mansell was injured while performing “particularly hazardous and dangerous” duties, which would entitle her to an enhanced…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Bowen v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Heaton v. Marin County Employees Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dietz v. Meisenheimer & HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.