Legal Opinion

Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 2013No. E054712Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/8/13 Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO PAUL TOMKO, Plaintiff and Appellant, E054712 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC10006938) LEO A. BATISTELLI et al., OPINION Defendants and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API