Legal Opinion

Jones v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 26, 1993No. 2 CA-SA 93-0096PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

In this special action, we are called upon to determine whether the respondent trial court properly applied the recently amended discovery rules, specifically Ariz.R.Civ.P. 26.1, 16 AR.S. Traditionally, this court is loath to become involved in a pretrial discovery dispute. See Duquette v. Superior Court, 161 Ariz. 269, 778 P.2d 634 (App.1989). However, given the supreme court’s intent in adopting the amendments to effect a dramatic change in the manner in which discovery is conducted, see Ariz.R.Civ.P. 26.1 court comment, the absence of any appellate decisions on the…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Allstate Insurance v. O'TooleArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zimmerman v. ShakmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Perguson v. TamisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Bryan v. RiddelArizona Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API