Legal Opinion
Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Inc. v. Young
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 13, 1994No. CX-94-1294PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, * Judge.
Appellant Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pécora, Inc., challenges the district court’s confirmation of an arbitration panel’s award of punitive damages on the grounds the arbitration panel exceeded its powers. Appellant also asserts the district court improperly awarded postjudgment interest pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 334.01 (1981).
We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Michael Young purchased stock in a company named Bioplasty, Inc. between June 1990 and November 1991 from Donald Johnson (Johnson), a stockbroker. Johnson was employed by Van…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State, Office of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Professional EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jeppsen v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999