Legal Opinion

Becker v. Meyer Rexall Drug Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1985No. Docket 77354PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed suit against defendant for alleged actions which resulted in the death of plaintiff’s decedent. Defendant brought a motion for accelerated judgment, which was denied. Defendant sought leave to appeal. Leave was granted by this Court on July 27, 1984.

Plaintiff’s original complaint, and the amended complaint filed after the motion for accelerated judgment was heard, allege that defendant negligently filled plaintiff’s decedent’s prescription. Plaintiff alleged that defendant supplied decedent with the drug Diabinese instead of the prescribed drug Dilalume. The Diabinese was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Kuznar v. Raksha Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Simmons v. Apex Drug Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Cackowski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. MacDonald v. BarbarottoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API