Legal Opinion

Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. Rose

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1989No. Docket 97839, 98058PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

Plaintiff, Law Offices of Law rence J. Stockier, P.C., appeals as of right from a judgment following a bench trial in the Oakland Circuit Court. Stockier sued defendants David and Sydney Rose, his wife, to recover legal fees. The Roses filed a counterclaim for legal malpractice in two matters: (1) Stockler’s representation of the Roses in their suit against Touche Ross and Company (hereafter referred to as the Touche Ross case); and (2) Stockler’s defense of Sydney Rose in a garnishment proceeding initiated by Hammond Organ Company (hereafter referred to as the Hammond Organ case). Stockier…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API