Legal Opinion
Cackowski v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 2000No. 1981204PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Brenda Cackowski and Michael Cackowski, the plaintiffs in a negligence/wantonness action, appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict returned in favor of the defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
On October 11, 1995, Brenda Cackowski enrolled in a physician-supervised weight-loss program and was prescribed a number of medications: Verelan, Profast, and Pondimin. Verelan is a medication commonly prescribed for high blood pressure. Profast and Pondimin are diet…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Continental Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- K.S. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Driver v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ex Parte SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Anderson v. Alabama Reference LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- M.C. v. Tallassee Rehabilitation, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Lyons v. Walker Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.