Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Barbarotto

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1987No. Docket 86221PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Daniel MacDonald, appeals from a grant of accelerated judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 116.1(5), now MCR 2.116(C)(7), based on the two-year limitation period applicable in medical malpractice cases. We affirm.

The facts are not substantially in dispute. Plaintiff, a mechanic, sustained a back injury while at work in December, 1979, and was disabled from employment. According to plaintiff, he subsequently was treated by two physicians over the following two years. He received workers’ disability compensation benefits from Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, his employer’s compensation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State Mutual Cyclone Insurance v. O & a Electric CooperativeMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wiley v. Henry Ford Cottage HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Norris v. City of Lincoln Park Police OfficersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API