Legal Opinion
In Re Einstein
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 3, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2573PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant made application to the Patent Office in serial No. 673,547, on November 8, 1923, for what he claimed was a. new and improved grinder wheel oscillator. As finally amended, fourteen claims were attached to his application, claims 3, 6, 10, 11, and 12 being allowed, and claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 being rejected by both tribunals in the Patent Office. The appellant has assigned error on the refusal of the rejected claims.
Claims 1, 7, and 9 were rejected on the ground that it did not involve invention to substitute gear wheels and a gear unit,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dececo Co. v. George E. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- In re PrescottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- In re McConnellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Wappler Electric Co. v. Bronx Hospital & DispensaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Application of Antoine GazdaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- In Re Van YzerenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950