Legal Opinion

Wappler Electric Co. v. Bronx Hospital & Dispensary

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 3, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This suit was originally brought on four patents. By a stipulation reached before announcement for trial, the cause was discontinued as to three of the patents without prejudice, and the trial went on as to the patent to R. H. Wappler, No. 1,371,404, and on claims 4 and 5 thereof. Because, as stated by the plaintiff, the suit was based upon the use of a single machine, for which any damage recoverable would be small, an accounting was waived.

Counsel appearing for the defendant stated in open court and on the record that they were actually appearing at the request of,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Mead Morrison Mfg. Co. v. Exeter Mach. WorksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Russell Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. In Re EinsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Winsted Hardware Mfg. Co. v. Samson-United Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API