Legal Opinion
In re Prescott
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 6, 1922No. 1460PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Application by Sydney I. Prescott and another for a patent for an automobile wheel equipment. Prom a decision of the Commissioner of Patents rejecting 16 claims, the applicants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBBj Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office rejecting claims 1 to 6, inclusive, 13, 18, 22, 23,-24, and 26 to 31 inclusive in an application. Claim 28, in our view, fairly covers what applicant has done, and therefore is here reproduced:
“28. In a wheel equipment standardizing device, the combination with a hub, of a disc body removably mounted on said hub and having an integral seat for fully supporting a tire rim. and a quick-detachable tire rim remov-ably mounted on said seat, whereby a tire may be removed either alone, or with the rim as a unit, or with the rim and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re WoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In Re EinsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.