In re McConnell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge
This case presents an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office wherein the board modified a decision of the examiner rejecting all. claims, and allowed claims 1 and 3 of appellant’s application. Eighteen claims were rejected'by the boaixl and the appeal to us involves four of these, viz, Hos. 8, 16, 17, and 19.
*1140The claimed invention relates to the recovery of nicotine from tobacco. Claim 8 involves a process and reads as follows:
8. The process of recovering' nicotine from tobacco material, which comprises driving off free nicotine in vapor form, together with aqueous…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parke-Davis & Co. v. H. K. Mulford Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Dececo Co. v. George E. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- In re PrescottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In Re EinsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Application of FranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951