Legal Opinion

Simmon Omega, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 7, 1979No. C.D. 4815; Court No. 71-12-02126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Plaintiff challenges the classification by customs of certain phototypesetting machines imported from West Germany in 1969, 1970, and 1971. The machines were classified as “Other [photographic] enlargers” and assessed with duty at the rate of 10 or 9 per centum ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry, under item 722.18, TSUS, as modified by T.D. 68-9.1 Plaintiff claims that the imports are entitled to entry free of duty under the provision in item 668.25, TSUS, for typesetting machines.

I have concluded that plaintiff’s claim should be sustained.

Statutes Involved

Tariff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Englishtown Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. Corning Glass WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ehrenreich Photo-Optical Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Medline Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API