Legal Opinion

William Cherry Trust v. Hofmann

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1985No. L-84-319PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHandwork, J.

This matter is before the court, sua sponte. The case sub judice is a civil appeal purportedly from a judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court. For the following reasons, we conclude that the “judgment” sought to be appealed is not one that is final and appealable.

On July 24, 1984, the municipal court ruled on matters relating to an earlier default judgment which had been entered against defendants-appellees and which, at some later point, had been vacated. The July 24th ruling appears to have been directed to motions to correct and clarify the record as to what it was the trial court had…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. TripodoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. DayOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Cale Products, Inc. v. Orrville Bronze & Aluminum Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Millies v. MilliesOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Krasny v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Engelhart v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API