Legal Opinion
Hille v. Evans
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 5, 1920No. 9354PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John A. Perry, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
ON September 12, 1917, John E. Evans, defendant in error, brought suit against The Copper King Mines- Products Company on fifteen promissory notes, two of which were made payable to him, six to William Kelly, two to Jasper N. Wyman, three to Andrew B. Crichton and two to E. E. Lloyd, all executed and delivered by plaintiff in error, The Copper King Mines Products Company, and of all of which said Evans alleged he was the owner and holder. Evans and the company are hereinafter designated as in the court below. Summons was regularly issued and served and October 5, 1917, default was taken…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jenkins v. FowlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Robert E. Lee S. M. Co. v. EnglebachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Boldenweck v. BullisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Feldstein v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Philbrick v. Conejos County State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- City of Victor v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928