Boldenweck v. Bullis
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeals from the District Court of Clear Creek County. Eon. Frank W. Owers, Judge. Consolidated actions by Frederick .Boldenweck, on bebalf of himself and all other stockholders of The Consolidated Stanley Mining Company and The Salisbury Mining & Milling Company similarly situated, against Arthurc D. Bullis and William A. Williams et ah, against The First National Bank of Idaho Springs, Colorado, et al., against Charles J. Schofield and William Brown, Jr., et al., against…
Read the full summary
Appeals from the District Court of Clear Creek County. Eon. Frank W. Owers, Judge. Consolidated actions by Frederick .Boldenweck, on bebalf of himself and all other stockholders of The Consolidated Stanley Mining Company and The Salisbury Mining & Milling Company similarly situated, against Arthurc D. Bullis and William A. Williams et ah, against The First National Bank of Idaho Springs, Colorado, et al., against Charles J. Schofield and William Brown, Jr., et al., against The Jacksonville National Bank of Jacksonville, Illinois, et al., against Charles S. Bannells et. al., against Tyson S.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Appellant, as a stockholder of The Consolidated Stanley Mining Company and The Salisbury Mining & Milling Company, brought eight actions. To each case the respective appellees were made defendants. The purpose of these actions was two-fold: (1) To set aside judgments obtained by certain of the appellees against the companies in which plaintiff was a stockholder and The Stanley Consolidated Mining & Milling Company; and (2) to set aside conveyances of the first two companies named to the latter. The complaints are quite voluminous, but their averments are to the effect that a conspiracy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Alexander v. SearcySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- United Electric Securities Co. v. Louisiana Electric Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1895
- Bensiek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Matthews v. Headley Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- The Herald Company, (Cross-Appellant) v. Donald R. Seawell, (Cross-Appellees)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.