City of Victor v. Halstead
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
David Halstead, the defendant in error, obtained a peremptory writ of mandamus against the City of Victor, its mayor and the members of the city council, ordering the levy of a tax to pay certain overdue coupons cut from bonds of the city.' The city seeks a reversal of the judgment.
The amended answer discloses the following situation: The city is heavily in debt. The assessed valuation of its property is (1927) greatly reduced in value, being only $325,000, while its bonded debt is $523,000, which it is unable to pay. Because of this, some of its creditors have accepted new bonds to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kenneally v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949