Legal Opinion

City of Victor v. Halstead

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 8, 1928No. 12,087PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

David Halstead, the defendant in error, obtained a peremptory writ of mandamus against the City of Victor, its mayor and the members of the city council, ordering the levy of a tax to pay certain overdue coupons cut from bonds of the city.' The city seeks a reversal of the judgment.

The amended answer discloses the following situation: The city is heavily in debt. The assessed valuation of its property is (1927) greatly reduced in value, being only $325,000, while its bonded debt is $523,000, which it is unable to pay. Because of this, some of its creditors have accepted new bonds to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Kenneally v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API