Legal Opinion
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Local Union 745
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 1996No. 96 Civ. 6328 (DNE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER 1
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- National Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. SombrottoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pape v. Local 390 of the International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Chieco v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997