Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by United States of America against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. This settlement was embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14,1989 (“the Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provi sions. In the first phase of the Consent Decree, these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In re Baldwin-United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- City of Rocklin v. Sierra Lakes ReserveSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Nebraska Public Power District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Erbacci v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Local Union 745District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re StabileDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.