Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 14, 1997No. 88 Civ. 4486(DNE)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the *234voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions. In the first phase of the Consent Decree, these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API