Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 9, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions. In the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API