Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 27, 1990No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The remedial provisions in the Consent Decree provided for three Court-appointed officials, the Independent Administrator to oversee the all aspects of the Consent Decree, an Investigations Officer to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, WarehousemenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API